Posted 09 November 2009 - 02:40 AM
Hi Debbie,
thanks for that.
My sister's fine. It's not so much that our family have LOW blood pressure - I think I gave the wrong impression. More that of the six offspring, none have blood pressure problems - none even have HIGH normal, and given the extent of blood pressure problems in the community, that's probably unusual. Mine was never more than 120/70 before the hyperaldosteronism.
My sister also has a daughter with lots of allergies, so they cook most of their own food from scratch, using little salt, which is probably not the best for her. Also, she's trying to lose about 5kg slowly, and has been substituting her normal breakfast of toast and vegemite (VERY australian, and VERY salty) with fruit, so perhaps a combination of things.
We actually agree more than you probably think on Blood pressure. I couldn't agree more that readings of (say) 160/100 (which is what I was getting for a few months recently) is not sustainable. What we DON"T agree on, is how urgent it is.
I can appreciate that with having had heart problems you see it more as an urgent thing, but anything under 170/110 is still only mildly elevated, and wouldn't be treated as an emergency by anyone. You'd be told to go back to your doctor and get your dose adjusted.
I've looked at gazillions of bits of info and can see that there's quite a lot of consensus about blood pressure. Even turning up with 180/120, I was sent for an 'urgent' appointment with a specialist - but not to the emergency department.
When my blood pressure was out of control one time, and was about 220/130, I was at the specialist, and he said 'I'll tell you in about 30 seconds whether or not you're going into hospital tonight', checked my eyes, heart etc and saw no sign of damage so it was left for the drugs to try to do their work within days, rather than the hours that would be the case otherwise.
I've only had one instance of 'hypertensive emergency' and that's the day my daughter was born (by elective caesar) and afterwards my blood pressure rose from 150/80 to get to 240/130 before it started coming down again. THAT's when it's an emergency, when it goes up really, really quickly to a very high reading.
I tend to see blood pressure readings as more along the line of cholesterol - higher readings do damage, but mainly over the long term - the majority of strokes are narrowed blood vessels and blood clots, the minority are burst blood vessels.
A few weeks of mildly elevated blood pressure is nothing to be alarmed about - my GP wasn't - but we were BOTH concerned about what to do IF it continued.
That's all I mean - with others who've posted here about their BP, theirs has also dropped back down, so hopefully it's just that ***** Cymbalta again.
So you see we do actually agree that 160/100 is a problem, it's just the degree we disagree on. :)
Speaking of degrees, stinking hot here at the moment - prob the hottest first half of Nov since 1902! Nearly 100 F nearly every day for the next week and it's not even summer!
Maureen.
Exam week for the poor year 12s too.
You can't stop the waves, but you can learn to surf.